The American Council on Science and Health responds to a New York Times article on the paper’s genetically modified organisms’ coverage.

Why America’s supposed newspaper of record has become a voice for anti-biotechnology food activists remains a profound mystery. The only plausible explanation is that this is calculated; the New York Times must be tailoring its reportage to its customers, who consist mostly of well-to-do, organic-food-eating elites. Evidence plays little to no role in the paper’s coverage of controversial scientific issues.

To read the full story at the American Council on Science and Health.